Terrorists acquire ballistic missiles

Imagine Osama Bin Laden with with nuclear-capable missiles, and you have an idea of what the Israelis must like now.

Hezbollah now has Scud missiles , courtesy of Syria, according to Israeli and Arab newspapers.  I haven’t seen any official Hezbollah confirmation, but considering that the Lebanese terrorist group already has an arsenal of tens of thousands of Katyusha-style short-range rockets thanks to its Iranian and Syrian patrons, it seems plausible.

This is a lose-lose deal for everyone. For the Israelis, depending on which model of the Scud we’re talking about (there are several homegrown Iranian and North Korean knockoffs of the original 1950s Soviet missile), the missiles have a range of 100 to 400 miles, which would put Lebanon-based Scuds within range of most of Israel, including Israeli airbases and the nuclear plant at Dimona. Unless the missiles can be shot down by Patriot or Arrow anti-missile batteries, which is a dicey proposition at best, Israel has to reckon on any target in the nation being struck. Scuds are notoriously inaccurate for precision strikes – Iran and Iraq couldn’t do any better than lob them at each other’s big cities in the 1980s – but there is always the potential for technology like GPS to improve accuracy.

For the Obama administration, which has been determined to improve ties with Syria, this is going to complicate plans to send the first ambassador to Damascus since 2006. But the more interesting question is what a terrorist group’s acquisition of long-range rockets means for Obama’s goal of reducing global nuclear arsenals. Hezbollah may not have nuclear weapons, but it has ballistic missiles that can easily carry chemical or radiological weapons. Israel has refused to join international agreements on nuclear arms, or even officially acknowledge that it has them. Lots of luck convincing Jerusalem to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty now.

Syria and Iran are no doubt hoping to deter any Israeli military action – like bombing Iranian nuclear sites. Bomb us, Evil Zionist Entity Whose Name We Dare Not Speak, and our proxy Scud-stud Hezbollah will rain death and destruction on you while we sit on the sidelines and laugh. Brilliant, unless of course Israel decides that with Iran trying to build nukes and a hostile terrorist group on its border, it might as well strike before the situation gets any worse. And if Syrian President Bashar al-Assad wants to reassure the Israelis that it’s safe to hand back the Golan Heights, maybe pointing missiles at them isn’t the smoothest PR move?

Finally, the biggest losers are the Lebanese. Hezbollah is a state within a state, with more military muscle than Lebanon’s army. Now Hezbollah has ballistic missiles. It’s as if Mexico sent Scuds to the Hutaree militia in Michigan, to be aimed at the Canadians.

When Hezbollah rocketed northern Israel in 2006, the Israeli Air Force pulverized Lebanon’s infrastructure. Israel didn’t care that Hezbollah has more loyalty to Tehran than Lebanon. The rockets came from Lebanon, and that’s who Israel rightfully held responsible. I don’t want to think what the Israeli response will be to Scuds landing on Tel Aviv, but I know who will pay the price.

This entry was posted in Foreign Affairs, War and Peace, World and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Terrorists acquire ballistic missiles

  1. libtree09 says:

    I am a little confused by this post, although confusion is a natural state for me. Are you putting scuds in the ballistic missile catagory or are worried they, terrorist/political groups organizations will get their hands on a true ballistic missile? Those super sonic sub space things. It was my understanding that Obama is trying to get a handle on what material is out there, where it is and is anything missing and can we get the material reduced so it can not get in the wrong hands and if it does we will be aware something is missing. Khan after all did what IBM did when the apple computer came out; they built their own from off the shelf material. We need to inventory the shelves.

    Now Obama wants to open a dialog with Syia and you can’t be opposed to that, since I know you are reasonable and it is better to talk to your enemies and have a dialog if the shit hits the fan. I believe John Kennedy learned the importance of this during the missile crisis. Syria and Lebanon have a big stake in the game and at some point should be getting sick of Iran’s nonsense. However they do get their oil from Iran don’t they? Just saying we have to put up with a lot of shit from the Saudi’s including have their citizens blowing up our skyscrapers. So maybe Isreal won’t sign an agreement so maybe Syria so sign either…so we’re back to normal in the middle east but having Russia and China sign is still a big deal. And if Syria does sign and Israel doesn’t well I guess they can blow the shit out of Syria…even though it would no doubt be a nut case in Iran behind the move. Damn no wonder I’m confused.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s